|
MAANZ
|
|
Maritime Archaeology
|
|
Home
| About MAANZ | Maritime Archaeology
| Present Projects | Reports
and Articles etc.
SiteMap | Membership | Contacts | The Conservation Lab | Links |
|
In October 1902 using a hard hat and
suit, a Benedictine Monk named Father Blundell, conducted one of the
earliest underwater archaeological surveys, with a study of a crannog
in Loch Ness. These crannogs are man-made islands, on which dwellings
were constructed, but which have long since disappeared. There are over 350
crannogs scattered throughout Scotland, some of which are currently
being studied. One of them dates back to 595BC.
Since 1902 and the invention of the aqualung in 1943, many underwater sites and shipwrecks have been relocated throughout the world. Many of these sites have been discovered by accident and some through years of research and diving, initially in a search for treasure, and later as serious archaeological investigations. Some of the most well known discoveries around the world are:
MARITIME ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN NEW ZEALAND Of the 2000+ shipwrecks around New Zealand's coast, around 150 have been relocated, either through research or by accident. Most of these wrecks have been subjected to raids by divers for the odd relic or for their treasure. As far as MAANZ is aware, the only shipwrecks or underwater sites that have had any sort of archaeological techniques applied to them, are:
Of the 2000 shipwrecks around our shores, approximately 1200 come under the protection of the Historic Places Act. For any vessel protected under this Act, a permit must be obtained from the Trust before the site is altered in any way. The Marine Reserves Act also provides protection for wreck sites and is administered by the Department of Conservation, through which it is possible to obtain a permit to undertake a survey of a wreck within the boundary of a marine reserve. Although the wrecks have legal protection, they continue to be subjected to raids by divers for the odd relic. Of all the wreck sites that have been raided, there has only been one case where a diver has been taken to Court for damaging a historic wreck site. This occurred in 1983. The site was that of the Taupo. The diver was charged and convicted, but took the case to the High Court where the charge was dismissed, as it could not be proved that he knew the wreck was over 100 years old. Although the charges were dismissed, this was the first time that a shipwreck was recognised as being an historic site. Now that any wreck or submerged site prior to 1900 is considered to be an Historic Site, this argument can no longer be used. David Churchill Since David wrote this introduction about maritime archaeology, there has been over 13 years of active and ongoing progress in the conservation of New Zealand's underwater heritage. |
|
|
|
Home
| About MAANZ | Maritime Archaeology
| Present Projects | Reports
and Articles etc.
SiteMap | Membership | Contacts | The Conservation Lab | Links |